06-02-2012, 05:57 PM
The stated MPG figures that Citroen gave for this engine was:
Urban 32 mpg
Extra urban 49mpg
combined 40 mpg
Compaired to the 2.0hdi which was 39 / 57 / 49 respectively.
It was the low quoted MPG that convinced me to go for the 1.6 petrol which was the same price and abit quicker off the mark.
Now given that most stated MPG figs are based on perfect driving conditions and often seem out of touch with reality, you might be getting a combined figure of nearer 35 mpg and apart from making your foot a bit less heavy, there's probably not that much you can do about it.
Urban 32 mpg
Extra urban 49mpg
combined 40 mpg
Compaired to the 2.0hdi which was 39 / 57 / 49 respectively.
It was the low quoted MPG that convinced me to go for the 1.6 petrol which was the same price and abit quicker off the mark.
Now given that most stated MPG figs are based on perfect driving conditions and often seem out of touch with reality, you might be getting a combined figure of nearer 35 mpg and apart from making your foot a bit less heavy, there's probably not that much you can do about it.
![[-]](http://berlingoforum.b-cdn.net/images/collapse.png)
