Posts: 1,124
Threads: 32
Thanks Received: 217 in 171 posts
Thanks Given: 18
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire
Reputation:
3
01-11-2012, 09:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2012, 09:18 PM by steve valentine.)
The difference is like night and day.
Having driven both, and owned a 2.0hdi for the last 6 years, I feel I am qualified to answer. The hdi is more fuel efficient and far, far quicker.
The one you linked to looks very tidy, don't let the mileage put you off, my 52 plate is at 140k, and its never let me down in 6 years.
Somedays you're the pigeon, Somedays you're the statue.
Posts: 476
Threads: 17
Thanks Received: 117 in 92 posts
Thanks Given: 153
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Rayleigh Essex UK
Reputation:
0
I agree with Steve, if you ever go on motorways get a HDI! The 1.9d plods well enough, I have owned mine for ten years now, but have driven all Berlingo's with work and I like the 2.0 HDI the best. FSH is a big bonus with the one you are watchin too.... they go on for ages...
Adam..2003..1.9D..LX..Silver Crew Cab Van.....
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried.
Posts: 527
Threads: 51
Thanks Received: 70 in 63 posts
Thanks Given: 23
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Gloucester, UK
Reputation:
0
I've got the 1.9 and, although I like it, it is woefully slow. Steep hills especially with a full load of adults can see you plodding up with the lorries.
Malc
Stupid computer!
Security system should not fail safe!
Security system should fail dangerous!
•